Graham Gill
Round Table Event
 

Part of a series of Roundtable events hosted by Dominique Graham, Partner at Graham Gill, addressing core management issues.

Mergers: Solution or Distraction

Panel members:
Addleshaw Goddard   Richard Linsell
BDO Stoy Hayward   Dermot Mathias
Boardroom Review   Dr Tracy Long
Dewey LeBoeuf   Peter Sharp
DLA Piper   Nigel Knowles
Freshfields   Mark Rawlinson
Fried, Frank   Jerry Walter
Inchcape Plc   Claire Chapman
ITV   Andrew Garard
Linklaters   David Cheyne
Macfarlanes   Charles Martin
Morgan Stanley   Richard Rosenthal
QC   Robert Webb
Shell   Richard Wiseman
SJ Berwin   Stephen Kon
Skadden Arps   Michael Hatchard
Slaughter & May   Nigel Boardman
Unilever   Stephen Williams
Visa Europe   Kirsty Whitehead
Dominique Graham, Nigel Boardman and Claire Chapman
   Dominique Graham, Nigel Boardman,
 Claire Chapman
     
Peter Sharpe and Marc Rawlinson
Peter Sharpe Marc Rawlinson
Nigel Knowles and Dr Tracy Long
Dr Tracy Long Nigel Knowles

Richard Wiseman and Richard Rosenthal
Richard Wiseman Richard Rosenthal
David Cheyne and Kirsty Whitehead
David Cheyne Kirsty Whitehead

Stephen Williams and Charles Martin
Stephen Williams Charles Martin
Steven Kon and Andrew Garrard
Steven Kon Andrew Garard
Jerry Walter and Dermot Mathias
Jerry Walter Dermot Mathias
Robert Webb QC, Dominique Graham and Richard Linsell
Robert Webb QC, Dominique Graham, Richard Linsell
Michael Hatchard
Michael Hatchard

Panel Member Quotes

"Sheer joy… as ever!"
Steve Williams

"I very much enjoyed the debate at the last roundtable. It was most interesting and it is always more fun when different views are expressed."
David Cheyne

"I much enjoyed the breakfast, a bit of conflict is always fun!"
Dermot Mathias

"It was, as ever, an interesting discussion.
Kristy Whitehead

"It is always instructive to hear the view of senior internal counsel, so I learned something – as well as enjoying the event."
Jerry Walter

"Thanks for organising a fun event."
Richard Linsell

"In the time allotted it was excellent."
Michael Hatchard

"I do so enjoy your roundtables and hope they work for GG".
Richard Linsell – Partner - Addleshaw Goddard

"Many thanks for the breakfast roundtable. It was all really good fun as per usual!"
Robert Webb QC - Chairman - Autonomy

"Lovely to meet you this morning and thank you very much for this morning's discussion - very interesting and a good debate!"
Claire Chapman – General Counsel & Group Company Secretary - Inchcape

'A stimulating and rich debate of issues critical to law firms and their clients'.
Nigel Boardman – Partner - Slaughter and May

Summary

Our last roundtable “Merger: Solution or Distraction” raised interesting issues covering: the importance of size; delivery of service to client; relationship of trust; increasing globalisation and the impact on client needs; outsourcing and the need to deliver value as well as driving cost down.

In walking the tightrope between providing value and competitive pricing, debate became animated.

The conclusion seemed to be that merger could both be a solution and a distraction, the secret lying in the success of post-merger integration as well as having a strategic aim.

Clients’ concerns are highlighted in the quotes selected below.

Law firms should take heed before embarking on a merger strategy.

Robert Webb
“One of the troubles that you get as a client with a merger is that your solicitor spends 10 years describing his strengths, and then when the merger discussion starts he spends the next two years describing his weaknesses. It is the first time you have ever seen him in this candour mould and it is a bit disconcerting.”

Richard Wiseman
“It is very rare, in my experience, to say to a firm ‘we do not think you have enough people working on this, and if only you would merge you could throw some more fee earners at our problem.’ “
Stephen Williams
“If we wanted to instruct the firm they had merged with we would have been instructing the firm they had merged with already.”

Richard Rosenthal
“We are not going to go to a law firm just because you have offices in three relevant jurisdictions. If it creates more internal disruption, you really cannot deliver that level of quality on a global basis, then it is not going to be an advancement from a client’s perspective. I think a merger is very good if you can broaden your depth and capabilities and provide a much stronger, integrated and local service, on a global basis.”

Claire Chapman
“Clients are very fickle: we want everything, we want it now and we want it our way. I think there are huge benefits to merging, but I want everything to change and stay the same at the same time. Take away my relationship partner and I would get very upset.”

Andrew Garard
“I do and I do not agree whether the clients actually do care about a merger. I really do not care about the nuts and bolts, but I do wonder why some firms feel the need to proliferate expensive services in London, HR, accounting, IT, rather than looking at a model of going North, as we do. But also, I have found with some firms who have merged, it does actually affect me as a client in ways I do not like, because all of a sudden the culture changes, there is a stricture on the way that service is delivered. So previously nice, cosy relationships disappear, and I find that the partners who were very happy in the pre‑existing environment all of a sudden become not so happy and the team starts to fragment. That gives me another headache; I then have to try to look to the panel as a whole and see where I can get the expertise which may have just disappeared.”

Graham Gill 2-3 Cursitor Street London EC4A 1NE  t: 020 7430 1711 f: 020 7831 4186

Concerned about confidentiality? Read this | © copyright Graham Gill 2011